From: The Courier-Post, by Kathleen Davis
As New Jersey's budget picture grows bleaker because of dwindling
tax revenue, there is more talk in Trenton about increasing taxes.
During this time of a deep economic recession increasing taxes,
especially on businesses, is the wrong move.
The
governor has proposed three business tax increases: a hefty increase in
the unemployment insurance tax (up to $100 per employee), extending a 4
percent corporate tax surcharge that was due to expire this year, and
increasing (again) the "half-millionaire's" income tax (90 percent of
businesses pay their taxes through the income tax).
A
2009 study conducted by the American Legislative Exchange Council
(ALEC) ranks New Jersey 48th in terms of our economic outlook largely
because of our taxation policies and the high cost of doing business in
the state. Our state's tax policies also put us at the bottom of the
Tax Foundation's 2009 Business Tax Climate Index, and the Small
Business & Entrepreneurship Council's Business Tax Index of 2008.
More tax increases today will harm our ability to recover at the end of
the recession.
So,
what should our policymakers do? Reduce spending! Now is the time,
during this crisis, to make much needed, long overdue changes to the
benefits received by public workers, as well as the work rules that
govern them -- that is, the Civil Service system. We are at the crisis
point where the excesses of the past are bearing down and demanding
solutions and action.
The
growth in the size of the state government work force and the benefits
afforded public employees at all levels of government has become
seriously unsustainable and out of sync with those received in the
private sector.
State employee benefit costs have more than doubled since 2002, and total about $4.3 billion in the fiscal year 2010 budget.
Here are the Chamber of Commerce of Southern New Jersey's recommendations to save taxpayer dollars:
Change
how retirement benefits are calculated for public employees in New
Jersey. Instead of dividing each employee's number of years worked by
55, divide it by 60. That will save taxpayers tens of millions of
dollars
.
Change the pension calculation for retiring state workers to be
based upon each employee's five highest earning years rather than their
three highest earning years.
Limit enrollment in the state health benefits plan to those who work a minimum of 35 hours per week.Tie employee contributions to health insurance to a percentage of the premium rather than a percentage of salary.
Suspend civil service work rules to allow for the more efficient deployment of the state labor force.
While
some changes will not yield immediate savings, they will in the future.
If nothing is done to rein in these costs today, taxpayers can be
certain that they will have to pay more and more to feed the ever
increasing appetite of public employee benefits.
Besides
employee related costs, the governor and Legislature should work, in a
bipartisan manner, to determine the absolute necessity of programs and
provide financial support for them only, while suspending others that
are "nice to have." Taxpayers and business owners do this every day.
A
state's tax policies do have an impact on the decisions of where people
want to live and where businesses want to locate. Reducing expenses can
avoid or mitigate tax increases. And while the governor has made some
significant reductions, we believe more can and should be done.